Has the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in more advanced breast cancer? A hospital-based retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The suspension of breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic altered patient diagnosis and management. This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns, screening delays and reduced healthcare attendance on changes in tumour and treatment characteristics, particularly for biologically more aggressive breast cancers. METHODS: This retrospective single-hospital analysis utilized data from a prospective cancer database between July 2019 and June 2022. Patient, tumour and treatment factors were compared across pre-pandemic, pandemic and post-pandemic groups. RESULTS: Symptomatic breast cancer increased from 42.3% in the pre-, 53.1% in the pandemic and 57% in the post- respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Compared to the pre-pandemic group (4.6%), an increase in stages 3 or 4 breast cancers in the pandemic (8.5%) and post-pandemic (7.1%) was found. Increased node-positivity in Ki67 > 20%, grade 3 or ER- tumours post-pandemic (+5.4%, +14.8%, +33.4%, respectively) was identified. More neoadjuvant chemotherapy was found in both the pandemic (+4.3%) and post-pandemic (+11.3%, P = 0.0261) groups. An increase in hypofractionated radiotherapy in the post-pandemic group (+9.4%) was also identified. CONCLUSION: Our study identified a decrease in early-stage cancers and an increase in node positivity, particularly for biologically more aggressive tumours. An increase in the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hypofractionated radiotherapy during the pandemic and post-pandemic periods was also identified.

Liposuction for Advanced Lymphedema in a Multidisciplinary Team Setting in Australia: 5-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Liposuction for International Society of Lymphology late stage 2 or 3 limb lymphedema is an established surgical option to remove excessive adipose tissue deposition and has been performed in Australia since 2012 at the Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research, and Treatment (ALERT) Program of Macquarie University. METHODS: Between May of 2012 and May of 2017, 72 patients with unilateral primary or secondary lymphedema of the arm or leg underwent suction-assisted lipectomy using the Brorson protocol. This prospective study presents 59 of these patients who had consented to research with a 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients, 54 (92%) were women, 30 (51%) had leg lymphedema, and 29 (49%) had arm lymphedema. For patients with arm lymphedema, the median preoperative volume difference between the lymphedematous and the contralateral arm was 1061 mL, which was reduced to 79 mL 1 year after surgery and to 22 mL 5 years after surgery. For patients with leg lymphedema, the median preoperative volume difference was 3447 mL, which was reduced to 263 mL 1 year after surgery but increased to 669 mL 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Suction-assisted lipectomy is a long-term option for the management of selected patients with International Society of Lymphology late stage 2 or 3 limb lymphedema when conservative management can offer no further improvement. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Breast lymphedema following breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

PURPOSE: To examine the current evidence on breast lymphedema (BL) diagnosis and treatment after breast-conserving surgery, identify gaps in the literature, and propose future research directions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane, including studies published between 2000 and 2023. References were reviewed manually for eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who underwent breast conserving treatment (surgery ± radiation) for breast cancer, goals of the paper included analyzing or reviewing BL measurement with ultrasound or tissue dielectric constant, or BL treatment. Twenty-seven manuscripts were included in the review. RESULTS: There is variation in incidence, time course, and risk factors for BL. Risk factors for BL included breast size, primary and axillary surgery extent, radiation, and chemotherapy but require further investigation. Diagnostic methods for BL currently rely on patient report and lack standardized criteria. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and ultrasound (US) emerged as promising ambulatory BL assessment tools; however, diagnostic thresholds and validation studies with ICG lymphography are needed to establish clinical utility. The evidence base for treatment of BL is weak, lacking high-quality studies. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BL is not well defined. TDC and US show promise as ambulatory assessment tools for BL; however, further validation with lymphatic imaging is required. BL treatment is not established in the literature. Longitudinal, prospective studies including pre-radiation measurements and validating with lymphatic imaging are required. These data will inform screening, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment parameters for patients with BL after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Axillary Treatment and Chronic Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Implications for Prospective Surveillance and Intervention From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The PREVENT randomized trial assessed progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (cBCRL) after intervention triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM). This secondary analysis identifies cBCRL risk factors on the basis of axillary treatment. METHODS: Between June 2014 and September 2018, 881 patients received sentinel node biopsy (SNB; n = 651), SNB + regional node irradiation (RNI; n = 58), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 85), or ALND + RNI (n = 87). The primary outcome was the 3-year cBCRL rate requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 32.8 months (IQR, 21-34.3), 69 of 881 patients (7.8%) developed cBCRL. For TM, 43 of 438 (9.8%) developed cBCRL versus 26 of 443 (5.9%) for BIS (P = .028). The 3-year actuarial risk of cBCRL was 4.4% (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.1), 4.2% (95% CI, 0 to 9.8), 25.8% (95% CI, 15.8 to 35.8), and 26% (95% CI, 15.3 to 36.7). Rural residence increased the risk in all groups. For SNB, neither RNI (SNB, 4.1% v SNB + RNI, 3.4%) nor taxane (4.4%) increased cBCRL, but risk was higher for patients with a BMI of ≥30 (6.3%). For SNB + RNI, taxane use (5.7%) or supraclavicular fossa (SCF) radiation (5.0%) increased cBCRL. For ALND patients, BMI ≥25 or chemotherapy increased cBCRL. For ALND + RNI, most patients received SCF radiation and taxanes, so no additional risk factors emerged. CONCLUSION: The extent of axillary treatment is a significant risk factor for cBCRL. Increasing BMI, rurality, SCF radiation, and taxane chemotherapy also increase risk. These results have implications for a proposed risk-based lymphedema screening, early intervention, and treatment program.

Factors associated with weight gain after breast cancer: Results from a community-based survey of Australian women.

PURPOSE: Weight gain after breast cancer is common. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with weight gain after breast cancer in Australian women. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between November 2017 and January 2018. Women living in Australia who self-identified as having breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in-situ were eligible. We created stepwise linear and logistic regression models to evaluate predictors for absolute and clinically significant (≥5%) weight gain respectively. RESULTS: Data from 276 women were analysed. Most were Caucasian and 92% had been diagnosed with Stage 0-III breast cancer. Absolute weight gain was associated with hot flushes, being in the menopausal transition at diagnosis, being less physically active than at diagnosis, lower eating self-efficacy when watching television or using a computer, and higher self-efficacy when anxious or nervous (F-ratio = 3.26, R2-adjusted = 0.16, p < .001). Clinically significant weight gain was associated with tamoxifen use (OR 2.7), being less physically active than at diagnosis (OR 3.1), and lower eating self-efficacy when watching television or using a computer (OR 0.82) (Chi-square 64.94, df = 16, p < .001). Weight gain was not associated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, aromatase inhibitor use, number of lymph nodes removed, or body mass index at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to prevent weight gain after breast cancer, particularly aiming to maintain physical activity, should be targeted at women receiving tamoxifen. The role of eating self-efficacy, especially attentive eating, in managing weight after breast cancer should be explored.

Safety of Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy After Breast Conservation Therapy and Radiation Therapy: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Conservative surgery and radiotherapy (CS + RT) have become the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer as an alternative to mastectomy. With the increasing rate of obesity and incidence of macromastia, surgeons increasingly encounter patients with a history of breast radiation desiring breast reduction. However, elective breast surgery after irradiation remains to be controversial due to known adverse effects of radiation, especially on wound healing, and unknown effects of lumpectomy on traditional pedicle choices. Herein, we present our experiences and outcomes of reduction mammaplasties and mastopexies in patients with breast cancer previously treated with CS + RT. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2020, 13 patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy, who have previously underwent CS + RT with or without axillary surgery, were included in this study. Surgical techniques and complications, including delayed wound healing, infection, fat necrosis, and nipple-areolar necrosis, were recorded and analyzed based on the irradiated versus nonirradiated sides. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients, delayed wound healing occurred in 7% on the irradiated side and 15% on the nonirradiated sides (P > 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between the number of complications and time of elective breast surgery from the last radiation therapy. Complications between irradiated and nonirradiated breasts did not significantly differ in both the reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy in patients with a history of lumpectomy and breast irradiation can be safely performed and should be considered in those experiencing macromastia or asymmetry post-CS + RT.

Prospective Surveillance with Compression for Subclinical Lymphedema: Symptoms, Skin, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Background: Patients underwent a compression (sleeve and gauntlet) intervention for subclinical breast cancer-related lymphedema (S-BCRL). Physical, emotional, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes were examined. Associations of change in extracellular fluid alone through bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or change in whole-arm volume through tape measure with the outcomes at time of S-BCRL were explored. Methods and Results: We enrolled newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer patients for surveillance up to 36 months postoperatively. Upon detection of S-BCRL, a 28-day compression intervention was initiated. Data were obtained through physical examination/measurement and self-report instruments: skin examination, Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Arm, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G), Breast (FACT-B), and FACT-B+4. Improvements with intervention were observed in the proportion of patients reporting symptom scores ≥3 in function (Cohen's d = -0.46, p < 0.01), in biobehavioral (Cohen's d = -0.30, p < 0.05), maximum number of skin conditions (Cohen's d = -0.34, p < 0.05. 3), FACT-B (Cohen's d = 0.52, p < 0.01), and FACT-B + four (Cohen's d = -0.42, p < 0.01). At the study endpoint, compared with those who did not progress, chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (C-BCRL) progressing patients had higher overall symptom scores (p = 0.037), more skin conditions (p = 0.009), and lower total FACT-G and FACT-B scores (p < 0.05). At the time of S-BCRL, detection of greater BIS unit change correlated with higher symptom, skin condition, and QoL values. Greater whole-arm volume change correlated with higher FACT-B+4 scores (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Prospective surveillance, symptom assessment, and compression intervention promote low progression rates from S-BCRL to C-BCRL and as such reduce symptom burden. This closed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02167659.

A new indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography protocol for diagnostic assessment of lower limb lymphoedema.

INTRODUCTION: The lower limbs are a common body site affected by chronic edema. Imaging examination of the lymphatic system is useful to diagnose lymphoedema, identify structural changes in individuals, and guide interventional strategies. In this study, we used a protocol combining indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography and ICG-guided manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) for the diagnostic assessment of lower limb lymphoedema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with lower limb lymphoedema were divided into three groups by their medical history: primary, secondary cancer-related, or secondary non-cancer-related. ICG lymphography was conducted in three phases: initial observation, MLD to accelerate ICG dye transit and reduce imaging time, and imaging data collection. Lymphatic drainage regions were recorded, and the MD Anderson Cancer Center ICG staging was applied. We collected routine lymphoedema assessment data, including limb volume and bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-six lower limbs that underwent ICG lymphography were analyzed. Eight drainage regions were identified. The ipsilateral inguinal and popliteal were recognized as the original regions, and the remaining six regions were considered compensatory regions that occur only in lymphoedema. More than half of the secondary cancer-related lower limb lymphoedema (57.6%) continued to drain to the ipsilateral inguinal region. The incidence of drainage to the ipsilateral inguinal region was even higher for the primary (82.8%) and secondary non-cancer-related (87.1%) groups. Significant associations were observed between cancer-related lymphoedema and the presence of compensatory drainage regions. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a prospective ICG lymphography protocol for the diagnostic assessment of lower limb lymphoedema in combination with MLD. Eight drainage regions were identified, including two original and six compensatory regions.

Barriers and enablers of weight management after breast cancer: a thematic analysis of free text survey responses using the COM-B model.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is common after breast cancer. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the barriers to and enablers of successful weight management for women with breast cancer. METHODS: This was a combined inductive and deductive framework analysis of free text responses to an anonymous cross-sectional survey on weight after breast cancer. Women were recruited mainly through the Breast Cancer Network Australia Review and Survey Group. We applied deductive thematic analysis to free text responses to questions on barriers, enablers, research priorities, and one open-ended question at the end of the survey using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model as a framework. Subthemes that arose from the inductive analysis were mapped onto the COM-B model framework. Findings were used to identify behaviour change intervention functions. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three women provided free text responses. Most women were of Caucasian origin and had been diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer, with a mean age of 59.1 years. Women's physical capability to adopt and sustain healthy lifestyle habits was significantly affected by treatment effects and physical illness, and some lacked psychological capability to self-regulate the face of stress and other triggers. Limited time and finances, and the social impact of undergoing cancer treatment affected the ability to control their diet. Frustration and futility around weight management were prominent. However, some women were confident in their abilities to self-regulate and self-monitor lifestyle behaviours, described support from friends and health professionals as enablers, and welcomed the physical and psychological benefits of being active in the context of embracing transformation and self-care after cancer. CONCLUSION: Women need specific advice and support from peers, friends and families and health professionals. There is a substantial gap in provision of supportive care to enable women to adopt and sustain healthy lifestyles. Environmental restructuring (including financial support), incentivization (creating an expectation of looking and feeling better), persuasion and coercion (aiming to prevent recurrence), and equipping women with specific knowledge and skills, would also facilitate optimal lifestyle behaviours and weight management.

Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing 3 years of prospective surveillance with intervention.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate risk factors (treatment-related, comorbidities, and lifestyle) for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) within the context of a Prospective Surveillance and Early Intervention (PSEI) model of care for subclinical BCRL. METHODS: The parent randomized clinical trial assigned patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer to PSEI with either bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM). Surgical, systemic and radiation treatments, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors were recorded. Detection of subclinical BCRL (change from baseline of either BIS L-Dex ≥6.5 or tape volume ≥ 5% and < 10%) triggered an intervention with compression therapy. Volume change from baseline ≥10% indicated progression to chronic lymphedema and need for complex decongestive physiotherapy. In this secondary analysis, multinomial logistic regressions including main and interaction effects of the study group and risk factors were used to test for factor associations with outcomes (no lymphedema, subclinical lymphedema, progression to chronic lymphedema after intervention, progression to chronic lymphedema without intervention). Post hoc tests of significant interaction effects were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected alphas of .008; otherwise, an alpha of .05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: The sample (n = 918; TM = 457; BIS = 461) was female with a median age of 58.4 years. Factors associated with BCRL risk included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (p < .001), taxane-based chemotherapy (p < .001), regional nodal irradiation (RNI) (p ≤ .001), body mass index >30 (p = .002), and rurality (p = .037). Mastectomy, age, hypertension, diabetes, seroma, smoking, and air travel were not associated with BCRL risk. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of 3 years of PSEI for subclinical lymphedema, variables of ALND, taxane-based chemotherapy, RNI, body mass index >30, and rurality increased risk.

The Utility of the Oncotype DX Test for Breast Cancer Patients in an Australian Multidisciplinary Setting.

Introduction: The Oncotype DX test is a genomic assay that generates a Recurrence Score (RS) predicting the 10-year risk of recurrence and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. The aims were to determine breast cancer distant recurrence and correlate with adjuvant chemoendocrine prescribing patterns based on the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-institution case series of 71 patients who had Oncotype DX assay testing after definitive surgery between 2012 and 2016. Both node-positive and node-negative patients were included. Patients were divided into Oncotype DX low risk (RS < 11) (n = 10, 14%), intermediate risk (RS 11-25) (n = 45, 63%), and high risk (RS > 25) (n = 16, 23%). Median follow-up was 6.1 years (range 4-8.9 years). Adjuvant treatment regimens and oncological outcomes were determined. Results. Mean age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 33-77). Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) accounted for the majority (87%), with most tumors measuring between 10-20 mm (52%). 48% of the cohort were node positive. 15 of 16 high-risk patients (94%) received chemotherapy. 96% of intermediate-risk patients received endocrine therapy alone, one patient received chemoendocrine therapy (2%), and one declined systemic therapy (2%). In the low-risk group, 100% received endocrine therapy only. The high-risk group had the lowest mean ER% (P < 0.05), greatest mean mitotic rate (P < 0.05), and greatest proportion of Ki67% > 14. Five patients developed distant recurrence (7%): three from the intermediate-risk group (7%), one from the low-risk group (10%), and one from the high-risk group (6%). Conclusion: This is the first Australian study reporting the experience with medium-term recurrence outcomes of using the Oncotype DX assay in breast cancer. Chemotherapy was rarely given for patients with low-to-intermediate RS and always offered in high RS. This pattern of prescribing was associated with low rates of distant recurrence. National funding models should be considered.

A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention.

Background: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). Methods and Results: This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following postsurgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve, and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n = 209), rates of postintervention progression to CDP, was assessed over 3 years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n = 482; TM n = 481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n = 442; TM n = 437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (interquartile range = 22, 35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n = 89 vs. 27.5%, n = 120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger were longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-12.6 vs. 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8-4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4% (n = 30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n = 7 vs. 19.2%, n = 23; relative risk = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95% CI, 2.3-20.3; p = 0.016). Conclusions: Compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02167659.

Weight Gain and Lymphedema After Breast Cancer Treatment: Avoiding the Catch-22?

Background: Overweight and obesity are strongly implicated in breast cancer (BC) development and are also a risk factor for BC-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods and Results: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2017 and January 2018. Analyses were restricted to women with localized BC, who provided information about BCRL (n = 238). Most women were not experiencing BCRL (55.46%). Mean self-reported weight at diagnosis was 68.55 kg for women without BCRL and 74.43 kg for women with BCRL (p = 0.0021). In this study, 50.9% with BCRL were overweight/obese at diagnosis (body mass index [BMI] ≥25) compared with 36.4% of women without BCRL (p = 0.003). For women without BCRL, 12.12% were classified as obese (BMI ≥30) versus 20.75% with BCRL. Women with BCRL were more likely to have gained >5% of body weight (p = 0.03), be currently overweight or obese (p = 0.004), and less active (48.11%) than they were at diagnosis than women without BCRL (33.33%) (p = 0.042). Having a structured exercise program, following a prescribed diet, and being accountable to someone else were identified as the main facilitators to successful weight loss and weight maintenance. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider obesity when personalizing axillary treatment and encourage lifestyle interventions and lymphedema screening after BC treatment.

Outcomes with Partial Breast Irradiation vs. Whole Breast Irradiation: a Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized trials have been performed comparing partial breast irradiation (PBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) though controversy remains, including regarding differences by PBI technique. We performed a meta-analysis to compare results between WBI versus PBI and between PBI techniques. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify modern randomized studies listed in MEDLINE from 2005 to 2020. PBI trials were divided into external beam radiation and brachytherapy techniques, with intraoperative radiation excluded. A Bayesian logistic regression model evaluated the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and acute and chronic toxicities. The primary outcome was IBTR at 5 years with WBI compared with PBI. RESULTS: A total of 9758 patients from 7 studies were included (4840-WBI, 4918-PBI). At 5 years, no statistically significant difference in the rate of IBTR was noted between PBI (1.8%, 95% HPD 0.68-3.2%) and WBI (1.7%, 95% HPD 0.92-2.4%). By PBI technique, the 5-year rate of IBTR rate for external beam was 1.7% and 2.2% for brachytherapy. Rates of grade 2 + acute toxicity were 7.1% with PBI versus 47.5% with WBI. For late toxicities, grade 2/3 rates were 0%/0% with PBI compared with 1.0%/0% with WBI. CONCLUSIONS: IBTR rates were similar between PBI and WBI with no significant differences noted by PBI technique; PBI had reduced acute toxicities compared to WBI. Because studies did not provide toxicity data in a consistent fashion, definitive conclusions cannot be made with additional data from randomized trials needed to compare toxicity profiles between PBI techniques.

Implementing a prospective surveillance and early intervention model of care for breast cancer-related lymphedema into clinical practice: application of the RE-AIM framework.

PURPOSE: Chronic lymphedema following breast cancer (BC) affects individuals physically, functionally, psychologically, and financially. Despite national guidelines and evidence-based research supporting a prospective surveillance and early intervention model of care (PSM), bridging the gap between research and clinical practice has been difficult. METHOD: As part of an international randomized controlled trial (RCT), Australian women with BC from four hospitals were recruited, monitored for lymphedema at regular intervals over a 3-year period, and were provided a compression garment if intervention was triggered. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework was used retrospectively to assess a PSM at the individual and organizational level for those who had completed at least 2-year follow-up (N = 219) in the RCT. RESULTS: The application of the RE-AIM framework retrospectively demonstrated an extensive reach to patients across public and private settings; the effectiveness of prospective surveillance and early intervention was achieved through low progression rates to clinical lymphedema (1.8%), and all hospital sites initially approached adopted the research study. Key implementation strategies necessary for effectiveness of this model of care included education to health professionals and patients, staff acceptability, and development of a referral and care pathway. Maintenance dimensions were evaluated both at the individual level with 92-100% adherence rates for all nonoptional study appointments over the 2-year period, and at the organizational-level, PSM was sustained after recruitment ceased for the research study. CONCLUSION: The PSM for lymphedema in BC can be successfully implemented using the RE-AIM framework applied retrospectively. The implementation of the PSM used in the RCT has assisted in changing clinical practices and improving the quality and effectiveness of the health care system.

The Risk of Subclinical Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema by the Extent of Axillary Surgery and Regional Node Irradiation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of subclinical breast cancer-related lymphedema (sBCRL) using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measure (TM) by the extent of axillary surgery and regional nodal irradiation (RNI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomized to surveillance with TM or BIS. A BIS ≥6.5 L-Dex units or TM volume change ≥5 and <10% above presurgical baselines "triggered" sBCRL. The incidence of sBCRL by sentinel node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with or without RNI was examined for 484 patients. Radiation was categorized as "limited RNI" (axilla level I/II only) or "extensive RNI" (axilla level III or supraclavicular fossa with or without level I/II). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 20.5 months, 109 of 498 patients (21.9%) triggered sBCRL (BIS 13.5% vs TM 25.6%; P <.001). In patients not receiving RNI, BIS triggered 12.9% of patients undergoing SNB and 25.0% undergoing ALND (P = .18). Extensive RNI significantly increased triggering with BIS versus no RNI after sentinel node biopsy (SNB; 33.3% vs 12.9%; P = .03) but not ALND (30.8% vs 25.0%; P = .69). Triggering by TM was greater than 25% for most subgroups and was inferior to BIS in discriminating the risk of sBCRL by utilization of RNI or axillary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The lower triggering rates with BIS and its better discrimination of the risk of sBCRL by receipt and type of RNI compared with TM support its use for posttreatment surveillance to detect sBCRL and to initiate early intervention. The risk of sBCRL increased with more extensive axillary treatment. Patients having ALND or extensive RNI require close surveillance for BCRL. Longer follow-up is required to determine rates of progression to clinical lymphedema.

Personalizing Conservative Lymphedema Management Using Indocyanine Green-Guided Manual Lymphatic Drainage.

Background: The Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research and Treatment Program (ALERT) at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia is one of the flagship programs of Australia's first fully integrated academic health sciences centre, MQ Health. The aim of this study was to describe our findings of compensatory drainage demonstrated by indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography in cancer-related upper and lower limb lymphedema and how this may be translated into clinical practice. Methods and Results: Retrospective data from 339 patients aged between 18 and 90 years with secondary cancer-related unilateral or bilateral lymphedema of the upper or lower limb who underwent ICG lymphography assessment at the ALERT clinic between February 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed. In patients with upper limb lymphedema, the ipsilateral axilla was the most frequent drainage region (74.9%), followed by clavicular (41.8%) and parasternal (11.3%). For patients with mild upper limb lymphedema, 94.4% drained to the ipsilateral axilla. No patients drained to the ipsilateral inguinal region. For lower limb lymphedema, drainage to the ipsilateral inguinal was most common (52.3%), followed by contralateral inguinal (30.7%), popliteal (26.1%), and gluteal (21.6%) regions. Three main patterns of superficial lymphatic compensation were identified based on which anatomical structure carried lymph fluid. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) was used to facilitate movement of the dye. A light/effleurage technique was sufficient to move the dye through patent lymphatic vessels; a slow and firmer technique was required to move the dye through areas of bridging dermal backflow. Conclusion: The introduction of ICG lymphography to our program and its use in guiding personalized conservative management plans, including facilitative MLD techniques, has translated into clinical practice and changed research and educational priorities within the ALERT program.

Prospective surveillance model in the home for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of delivering a prospective surveillance model in the home over 6 months for women at high risk of developing lymphoedema. METHODS: A single-group, intervention study recruited 20 women who had surgical and medical treatment for confirmed node-positive invasive breast cancer and therefore at high risk of developing arm lymphoedema. Participants received a package including Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) monitoring, lymphoedema education and support to promote self-management and physical activity. RESULTS: Participants adhered to BIS monitoring 74% of the time, and felt extremely confident in using the device. By 6 months, mean BIS L-Dex scores had increased from 3.5 (SD 5.6) to 8.4 (SD 11.1); five women (25%) who experienced > + 6.5 increase in L-Dex score were fitted with a compression garment. Self-reported symptoms and distress decreased by 0.4 out of 10 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.7); number of self-management strategies used increased by 0.6 (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2); and planned exercise increased by 2.8 h/week (95% CI 0.4 to 5.2). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate a prospective surveillance model of care in the home with BIS is feasible and associated with increased self-management. A Phase II randomised trial is warranted as well as research exploring the costs associated with implementing this model of care for high-risk individuals.

Weight management barriers and facilitators after breast cancer in Australian women: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Weight gain after breast cancer is associated with poorer health outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe how Australian breast cancer survivors are currently managing their weight. METHODS: Online cross-sectional survey open to any woman living in Australia who self-identified as having breast cancer, between November 2017 and January 2018. RESULTS: We received 309 responses. Most respondents described their diet as good/excellent and reported moderate-high levels of weight self-efficacy. Despite this, the proportion of overweight/obesity increased from 47% at time of diagnosis to 67% at time of survey. More than three quarters of respondents did not receive any advice on weight gain prevention at the time of diagnosis. 39% of women reported being less active after cancer diagnosis, and and few weight loss interventions were perceived to be effective. Facilitators were structured exercise programs, prescribed diets, and accountability to someone else, while commonly cited barriers were lack of motivation/willpower, fatigue, and difficulty maintaining weight. Women who cited fatigue as a barrier were almost twice as likely to be doing low levels of physical activity (PA) or no PA than women who did not cite fatigue as a barrier. CONCLUSIONS: We report high levels of concern about weight gain after BC and significant gaps in service provision around weight gain prevention and weight management. Women with BC should be provided with support for weight gain prevention in the early survivorship phase, which should include structured PA and dietary changes in combination with behavioural change and social support. Weight gain prevention or weight loss programs should address barriers such as fatigue. More research is required on the effectiveness of diet and exercise interventions in BC survivors, particularly with regard to weight gain prevention.